<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><description></description><title>rands tumbles</title><generator>Tumblr (3.0; @rands)</generator><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/</link><item><title>I’ve been trying on URL shortening services for the past year.  The usual story has been:...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I’ve been trying on URL shortening services for the past year.  The usual story has been: looks good, tell a friend, gets popular, and doesn’t scale. The end.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://bit.ly"&gt;Bit.ly&lt;/a&gt; has just been getting better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There’s an obfuscation argument to be made about URL shorteners. Yes, they’re hiding information behind their tiny URLs. Yes, meaning is lost, but there’s also fascinating data to be grabbed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.randsinrepose.com/assets/rands-bitly.png"/&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What you’re looking at URLs I shortened and published via Twitter for a two and a half week period in May/June.  The yellow line represents the number of followers I have, the blue line represents how many folks clicked on my specific shortened link, and the green bar is total clicks on that link regardless of who shortened it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While 2.5 weeks of data is statistically miniscule, what you’re seeing is roughly a 14% click-thru rate for the URLs that I shortened. You can argue that is artificially high because the shortened URL is obfuscated — you don’t actually know what content is behind the URL is until you’ve clicked on it — but in a world where 2% click-thru rates are pretty sweet, this is intriguing number.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I’m wondering what other folks are seeing…&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/136109994</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/136109994</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:14:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Being Geek</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The title of the next book is “Being Geek”.  This title provides a continuity problem with other Rands writings. Many years ago I wrote an article called &lt;a title="Rands In Repose: N.A.D.D." href="http://www.randsinrepose.com/archives/2003/07/10/nadd.html"&gt;Nerd Attention Deficiency Disorder&lt;/a&gt;. I went back and forth on the title: nerd or geek? It came down to the inevitable acronym: N.A.D.D. or G.A.D.D? Neither are great, but N.A.D.D. wasn’t horrific, so I picked nerd as my term to describe my species and stuck with it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As titles were debated for the new book, “Being Geek” showed up out of no where and I loved it. Again, the problem is, I kind’a picked nerd as the term, but “Being Nerd” just… doesn’t work.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This topic needs to be addressed early in the book. Am I going to stick with one label or jump back and forth? As research, I &lt;a title="Twitter / rands: Nerd or Geek -- which is m ..." href="http://twitter.com/rands/status/1741414780"&gt;asked&lt;/a&gt; Twitter which was more derogatory: nerd or geek? And why?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The response was fascinating. A collection is listed below along with some of my thoughts. Statistically, almost 50% said nerd was more derogatory. 15% nominated geek. 33% picked neither or abstained. 5% nominated dork.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is good news for the title, but does little to settle issue regarding picking a name and sticking with it. You be the judge:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Neither they are different things. geek think fandom. nerd think science.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/sceptre1067"&gt;sceptre1067&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Gerd, because non-musical mashups are always in poor taste.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Elebertus"&gt;Elebertus&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerd because they have no style or social skills.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/rdubulous"&gt;rdubulous&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd is more derogatory to me. I definitely use “geeky” as a compliment and point of connection when I describe people to each other.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/lrprice"&gt;lrprice&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Geek was more often used derogatively towards theatre types in high school.  Though that doesn’t stop me from identifying as one.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/rosko"&gt;rosko&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd is more derogatory because it is more broad. Geek refers to someone technical in some way.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/billread"&gt;billread&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I find “nerd” and “geek” acceptable. “Dork,” however, I feel is the insulting term.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/kiyoshimartinez"&gt;kiyoshimartinez&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“my think is thus. Nerds = intelligent. Geeks = antisocial.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/stupidbob307"&gt;stupidbob307&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerd: seems to connotate a lack of self and other-awareness. Geeks are smart, but temper intellectualism when society requires it, IMHO” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/jlongtine"&gt;jlongtine&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerds don’t bite the heads off live chickens … but that doesn’t answer the question” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/fortawesomer"&gt;fortawesomer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerd is way worse than geek. Geeks are useful, and occasionally cute.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/alice_at_night"&gt;alice_at_night&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“geek sheik. nerd terd.  Id prefer to be called a geek.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/PlutoniumX"&gt;PlutoniumX&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd. Nobody has ever called me a geek while punching me.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/thunderpete"&gt;thunderpete&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I’ve always thought that Nerd is about passion while Geek is about skill. But then, as a Tri-Lamb, I would think that, wouldn’t I?” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/lonelysandwich"&gt;lonelysandwich&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerd, definitely, to me a nerd is more trainspottery than a geek, geeks can be anoraks, but nerds are always anoraks (it is a UKism)” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/jamesk"&gt;jamesk&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: wtf?&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I had a friend that always said that a nerd was a geek with good grades” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/gooddoug"&gt;gooddoug&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“neither. im a proud geek/nerd” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/adambronte"&gt;adambronte&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;““Geek” always seemed to me somewhat cooler. And not necessarily connected with computers.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/riddle"&gt;riddle&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Over here, both are pretty bad. Nerd probably a little more so. “Boffin” is still considered kinder. Slightly.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/muirium"&gt;muirium&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: boffin?&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerd is def more derogatory. To me It has a more socially inept connotation.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/hacintosh"&gt;hacintosh&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“You praise the geek who built your website and laugh at the nerd waiting in line for Star Trek.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/PatrickTulskie"&gt;PatrickTulskie&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: this is spot on&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Who says they’re derogatory?  Nerd is more specific to science fiction/gaming fans and geek is tech related. They overlap though.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/zRows"&gt;zRows&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Geek is more derogatory because being a nerd is about lifelong learning; a geek obsesses about minutiae.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/jbwebb"&gt;jbwebb&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“In modern use, nerds are smart, and geeks are passionate-or at least well-read. Neither is derogatory. Nerd is the bigger compliment.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/bmf"&gt;bmf&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“whatever.  nerd/geek differences seem regional/sub-cultural.  like pop vs soda or trekkie vs trekker” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/freiheit"&gt;freiheit&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd is academic interests &gt; geek is hobby interests &gt; dork is socially stunted.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/SelfishIdol"&gt;SelfishIdol&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Geek. Nerd implies more academic or intellectual hobbies, geeks are into “odd” or unpopular things.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/jmlane"&gt;jmlane&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd does not relate to a skill. Geek adds value.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/papagarzio"&gt;papagarzio&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: interesting&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I think Nerd, it seems to imply a certain social awkwardness, Geek is more like ‘overabundance of knowledge in an esoteric topic’ - For instance, being a “Food Geek” would not necessarily make you “Nerdy”” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/ZacHarmany"&gt;ZacHarmany&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Both aren’t derogatory for me. Geek - other cool stuff = Nerd. A geek knows his stuff, a nerd knows only that.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/amaragrawal"&gt;amaragrawal&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Neither, but “geek” implies more social skills” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/thisisroot"&gt;thisisroot&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd… I consider myself a geek and have no problems with that moniker.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/maniacnl"&gt;maniacnl&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Some actually don’t mind receiving either title, but to me Geeks are usually thought of as socially inept, while Nerds are not.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/waakeupcall"&gt;waakeupcall&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Calling someone a dork seems more playful and flirty. You’re right….geeks are great at something and nerds love something, LOL!” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Handy_Randy"&gt;Handy_Randy&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I’ve always thought that geeks were nerds who also had some sort of social life, so I’d say “nerd” is more derogatory.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/cassarani"&gt;cassarani&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“neither? I typically identify myself as a nerd who tends to geek out over certain topics. nerd is constant with periodic geekery?” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/bryanjswift"&gt;bryanjswift&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I don’t take either to be particularly derogatory unless specific tones are in play.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/zacharydanger"&gt;zacharydanger&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd and geek have both lost their edge. Dork is the insult of choice.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/sheepeeh"&gt;sheepeeh&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: I agree&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“a geek is a nerd w/ some degree of social skills. a nerd is just a nerd.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/wobbet"&gt;wobbet&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Both can be equally derogatory. It just depends on how they are said.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/lazataz"&gt;lazataz&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd. “Geek” implies skills. “Nerd” implies lack of skills.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/mischakrilov"&gt;mischakrilov&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd, because it also implies a lack of social skills and such” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/danellis"&gt;danellis&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd is far more derogatory because IMO it’s farther down the rabbit hole. Geeks are obsessive but not cripplingly so.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/theghostofzandr"&gt;theghostofzandr&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Geeks bite heads off of chickens in circus sideshows. Nerds are interested in topics despite risks of being socially ostracized.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/hellbox"&gt;hellbox&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Depends entirely on the context. I would rather call myself a nerd (surprise…)- the wikipedia entry definitely sounds better…” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/somerandomnerd"&gt;somerandomnerd&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“both are anything but negative in my book, almost Awesome. Today I use Dweeb and Schmo the way we used Nerd and Geek ten years ago.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/randalltodd"&gt;randalltodd&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“”Geek” is worse than “nerd”: I don’t bite heads off chickens (cf circus geek).” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/catenate"&gt;catenate&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I always thought geek was nicer than nerd. Geek implies employability and intellectual curiosity. Nerd implies playing WOW all day.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/robertpalmer"&gt;robertpalmer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“neither are derogatory. Both are merely silly.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/robertbrook"&gt;robertbrook&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“My feeling is that people self-identify as “geek” and get *called* nerd, but that is in no way empirical.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/clockworksimon"&gt;clockworksimon&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: you, sir, are a geek&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“It’s highly regional, from my informal research. Therefore I have chosen to take both as equal compliments :)” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/nevyn"&gt;nevyn&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“def nerd; prob because of Revenge of the Nerds, etc. geek seems to have been owned more by our people. personally, I embrace both…” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/joshuajabbour"&gt;joshuajabbour&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“People seem to willingly call themselves both, but Geek, as a sound, is less attractive.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/robertjosiah"&gt;robertjosiah&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“I don’t find either to be derogatory and might introduce myself as either one.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/rhacer"&gt;rhacer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“”Geek” is more synonymous  with hacker while “nerds” get beat up and do homework for jocks.  At least that’s what I tell myself.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Timchi"&gt;Timchi&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Geek.  It has implications of being unusual and strange in a negative way.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/mzarra"&gt;mzarra&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Nerd. Tainted by the movies documenting their revenge.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/longbored"&gt;longbored&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“A geek watches Star Trek. A nerd owns a Star Trek uniform. I class myself as Geek for this reason.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/Kosh42EFG"&gt;Kosh42EFG&lt;/a&gt;) (&lt;i&gt;ed: timely and relevant&lt;/i&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“neither (or both, depending on who’s saying it). Call myself both at various times, more likely to self-identify as nerd.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/darkuncle"&gt;darkuncle&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Geek just implies an interest in Technology. Nerd implies an unhealthy obsession with anything. Also Geek is now Chic.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/sh1mmer"&gt;sh1mmer&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Neither are. I pride myself in being an all out Geek. ; )” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/MikeGrace"&gt;MikeGrace&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“nerd is more derogatory. geek is a badge of honour!” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/sirvivian"&gt;sirvivian&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;“Definitely geek. Geeks are socially awkward, and not necessarily smart - nerds are smart and just WAY too psyched by arcane topics.” (&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/ljharb"&gt;ljharb&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/105595328</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/105595328</guid><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 18:52:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Scrub List</title><description>&lt;p&gt;While I valiantly attempt to regularly use RSS readers, my standard means of mass information consumption remains the bookmark group. I have three: News, Mac, and Scrub.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Scrub is an ever evolving set of news aggregators that hit three to five times a day. They are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.reddit.com/" title="reddit.com: what's new online!"&gt;Reddit&lt;/a&gt;. Good news — more content. Bad news — turning into Digg.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/" title="Hacker News"&gt;YNews&lt;/a&gt;. Nerd news without the lame. So far.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://digg.com/" title="Digg"&gt;Digg.&lt;/a&gt; Sigh.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://digg.com/" title="Digg"&gt; &lt;/a&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://delicious.com/popular" title="Popular Bookmarks   on Delicious"&gt;Delicious Popular&lt;/a&gt;. Yeah, I still use Delicious.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.metafilter.com/" title="MetaFilter | Community Weblog"&gt;Metafilter&lt;/a&gt;. King of the random information nugget discovery.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://tweetmeme.com/" title="Tweetmeme - Hottest Stories on Twitter"&gt;Tweetmeme&lt;/a&gt;. On probation. Low yield.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://picocool.com/" title="PicoCool / Popular items"&gt;PicoCool&lt;/a&gt;. Random design finds.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ffffound.com/" title="FFFFOUND!"&gt;FFFFound!&lt;/a&gt; Recent addition. Looks promising.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/98371762</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/98371762</guid><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:53:18 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The Rules of Men When They Are Angry (Incomplete)</title><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;(Contradictions forthcoming)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. We believe we have it all figured out and when data arrives that reminds us that we do not, we get angry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. During this angry period, we are jerks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. We are never wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Don’t get in the way. We’ll take it out on you. Doesn’t matter who you are.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. There is likely no conversation you can have with us which is going to make us feel better.  We need to move from boiling over to simmer to gone.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. Gone will show up when you’re not looking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. You need to understand the basic reason we’re pissed, but even if you get us to talk, we’re not telling you the basic reason.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/96518682</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/96518682</guid><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:07:00 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>In a comfort food battle between mashed potatoes and mac’n’cheese, I’m not sure...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;In a comfort food battle between mashed potatoes and mac’n’cheese, I’m not sure who would win.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/96313755</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/96313755</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 22:12:18 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Plan for today, design for tomorrow.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Plan for today, design for tomorrow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95998150</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95998150</guid><pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:11:17 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Contentment escapes faster the longer you stare at it.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Contentment escapes faster the longer you stare at it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95913237</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95913237</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:11:09 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>I would pay $4 just to watch the Birdhouse movie. Perspective, people.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;I would pay $4 just to watch the Birdhouse movie. Perspective, people.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95871331</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95871331</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:11:09 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>All writing starts in Georgia 14 otherwise it’s not writing.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;All writing starts in Georgia 14 otherwise it’s not writing.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95871332</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95871332</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:11:09 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Management is the art of giving them what the need before they need it.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Management is the art of giving them what the need before they need it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95824268</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95824268</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:10:52 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Text-only movie posters: http://bit.ly/17zU1Ps</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Text-only movie posters: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/17zU1Ps"&gt;http://bit.ly/17zU1Ps&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95809609</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95809609</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:10:50 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>(correct URL) Text-only movie posters: http://bit.ly/17zU1P</title><description>&lt;p&gt;(correct URL) Text-only movie posters: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/17zU1P"&gt;http://bit.ly/17zU1P&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95809607</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95809607</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:10:50 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>When I say thrice, I feel English, nay snooty.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;When I say thrice, I feel English, nay snooty.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95794831</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95794831</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:10:45 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Because you should think before you speak: http://bit.ly/DwwGn</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Because you should think before you speak: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/DwwGn"&gt;http://bit.ly/DwwGn&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95746478</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/95746478</guid><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 10:06:49 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Getting tired of life reduced to talking points. #irony</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Getting tired of life reduced to talking points. #irony&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94968431</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94968431</guid><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:55:48 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>Highly recommend Important Things w/ Demetri Martin — half Wes Anderson, half Stephen Wright:...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;Highly recommend Important Things w/ Demetri Martin — half Wes Anderson, half Stephen Wright: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/1D6hI"&gt;http://bit.ly/1D6hI&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94724582</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94724582</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 22:54:51 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>In the job interview, what I try to understand is, “Are you aware of your surroundings?”</title><description>&lt;p&gt;In the job interview, what I try to understand is, “Are you aware of your surroundings?”&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94709837</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94709837</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:54:51 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>“The deal was —- we’ve give ‘em Obama, they don’t hate us...</title><description>&lt;p&gt;“The deal was —- we’ve give ‘em Obama, they don’t hate us anymore”: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/41sMhx"&gt;http://bit.ly/41sMhx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94624423</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94624423</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 16:54:34 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>It’s like the coffee knows I’m wearing a white shirt.</title><description>&lt;p&gt;It’s like the coffee knows I’m wearing a white shirt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94546712</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94546712</guid><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 11:53:47 -0400</pubDate></item><item><title>The only key you need: http://bit.ly/39Tzt (@eris)</title><description>&lt;p&gt;The only key you need: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/39Tzt"&gt;http://bit.ly/39Tzt&lt;/a&gt; (@&lt;a href="http://twitter.com/eris"&gt;eris&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><link>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94290374</link><guid>http://rands.tumblr.com/post/94290374</guid><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:46:20 -0400</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
